![]() |
||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||
| Read the current Monday Report below! |
||||||||||||||
| The ULA Monday Report! [The following is taken, for the most part, from the savetheinternet. com website, with a few ULA-esque flourishes added here and there.] "Save the Internet and Free Expression: Why We Can't COPE" Net Neutrality allows everyone to compete on a level playing field and is the reason that the Internet is a force for economic innovation, civic participation and free speech. If the public doesn't speak up now, Congress will cave to a multi-million dollar lobbying campaign by telephone and cable companies that want to decide what you read, what you know, and what you think by passing the COPE legislation (COPE standing for, and in every sense Orwellian: the Communications Opportunity, Promotion and Enhancement Act). This isn't just speculation -- we've seen what happens when the Internet's gatekeepers get too much control. Last year, Telus -- Canada's version of AT&T -- blocked their Internet customers from visiting a Web site sympathetic to workers with whom the company was having a dispute. And Madison River, a North Carolina ISP, blocked its customers from using competing Internet phone services. How would the gutting of Network Neutrality affect you? Google users—Another search engine could pay dominant Internet providers like AT&T to guarantee the competing search engine opens faster than Google on your computer. Innovators with the "next big idea"—Startups and entrepreneurs will be muscled out of the marketplace by big corporations that pay Internet providers for dominant placing on the Web. The little guy will be left in the "slow lane" with inferior Internet service, unable to compete. Political groups—Political organizing could be slowed by a handful of dominant Internet providers who ask advocacy groups to pay "protection money" for their websites and online features to work correctly. The ULA Literary Revolution website—Independent, grassroots organizations such as ours already have enough working against us within a media culture controlled by less than ten extremely for- profit conglomerations. A financially-tiered system of the Internet will place a domain such as ours onto the back-most burner of the cyber world. Our message will end up as far out-of-reach as can be if this type of classist, strata-faction is institutionalized into the Net. Shout NO to this – unless you support the push for absolute conformity of opinion as well as the push for mindless consumerism to dazzlingly new and dizzying heights. Bloggers—Costs will skyrocket to post and share video and audio clips—silencing citizen journalists and putting more power in the hands of a few corporate-owned media outlets. Blocking Innovation—Corporate control of the Web would reduce your choices and stifle the spread of innovative and independent ideas that we've come to expect online. It would throw the digital revolution into reverse. Internet gatekeepers are already discriminating against Web sites and services they don't like: * In 2004, North Carolina ISP Madison River blocked their DSL customers from using any rival Web-based phone service. * In 2005, Canada's telephone giant Telus blocked customers from visiting a Web site sympathetic to the Telecommunications Workers Union during a contentious labor dispute. * Shaw, a major Canadian cable, internet, and telephone service company, intentionally downgrades the "quality and reliability" of competing Internet-phone services that their customers might choose -- driving customers to their own phone services not through better services, but by rigging the marketplace. * In April, Time Warner's AOL blocked all emails that mentioned www.dearaol.com -- an advocacy campaign opposing the company's pay-to-send e-mail scheme. This is just the beginning. Cable and telco giants want to eliminate the Internet's open road in favor of a tollway that protects their status quo while stifling new voices, ideas and innovation. If they get their way, they'll shut down the free flow of information and dictate how you use the Internet. Take action NOW in an easy fashion: click on the link below to join the Save the Internet Petition (which goes out to congresspersons and senators) to which 700,000 Americans have already added their electronic John Hancocks. http://action.freepress.net/campaign/savethenet Keep in mind: public outcry prevented the FCC (when headed by Michael Powell, Colin Powell’s son) from allowing conglomerates to gain enough legal levelage to form near-monopolies over regional media markets. Can you imagine the majority of a citizenry’s news and information being spoon-fed to them by ONE SINGLE CONGLOMERATE, reminiscent of State-run media a la the USSR? That could have become reality, had concerned citizens not engaged in the protest. The ULA urges you to be a participant in this debate and not just a spectator. ……………………………………………………………………… This has been a ULA Action Alert! Don't just sit there, DO SOMETHING about it! ……………………………………………………………………… GO HERE TO ENTER THE MONDAY REPORT BOX. |
||||||||||||||